kind of blue mono or stereo hoffman
The tracklisting sequence error went uncorrected on the jacket for a further three decades, though some sellers confuse the label error and the cover error suggest the error on the cover is somehow proof of original provenance. If you listen to this audio over numerous speakers, the identical call will be replicated to each of them. Previously overlooked, there is some evidence that the distribution of promos and possibly manufacture may have been the work of more than one plant, possibly three. Ended: Apr 29, 2023 , 5:16PM. So, typically: XLP12345 1A, Five digit recording serial number, followed by a hyphen. You may ask how a perfectionist like Miles Davis or one of the other members of the band did not notice the pitch shift. You are right, I don't see on the record store web site the second date for this year. Have you read Fremer's review? 1959, 2013 Columbia Records, a division of Sony Music Entertainment / Originally release 1959 / All rights reserved by Columbia Records, a division of Sony Music Entertainement. The stereo versions are mixed in a similar fashion with center mixed into both left and right channels. During these sessions both a mono and a three-track stereo master were created, using a total of four tape recorders running in synchronisation one prime recorder and one safety backup each for mono and stereo. Different listening experience. Another, more welcome, discovery on inspecting the master tapes was that a complete alternate take of one tune still existed. If so, you bought a different version. Maybe theyre in your garden shed. If you love this record (and who in the world does not? The problem is that nobody knows what happened to the mono master tape. Yes, its not as ethereally spacious, but it better layers and balances the instruments in my opinion and if you remain unconvinced that mono can produce three-dimensionality, this record will convince you. Instead what you got were three islands joined together with added reverb. Affiliate programs and The promos were thought to be both pressed at Columbias Bridgeport Connecticut plant, according to W.B.s update, given the consistent label print and type-setting on the two versions. I'm not sure which transfer, mix and master the mono mix on HDTracks is, but I just ordered myself a copy of the limited edition mono vinyl only a couple days ago. Price: US $9.99. Hopefully I can find one to buy on Record Store Day. Conventional Wisdom fails the Reality Test. LPs deriving from a digital source should be anathema to analog purists (like myself) but the Music On Vinyl Kind of Blue sounds terrific, crisp and precise, yet never lacking in warmth or immediacy. If I can have a choice between Stereo & mono I always take the mono-album. Sometimes that works okay but other times not. I'd say 4th pressing since 1A,B,C were first pressings (A to NJ, B to Indiana, C to CA) and so D,E,F, would be second press, G,H,I would be third and J,K,L would be fourth (etc.). The prime stereo tape recorder had been running just over one percent slow, so on playback and during the mastering of albums it ran a little fast. So when I read imbeciles claiming Columbia used it into the 1980s because some records sound "better" with it, I get a bit crazy (er). One of the interesting discoveries made in 1992 when the tapes were first exhumed, was that Side 1 of the stereo issue, consisting of the tracks recorded at the first session, So What, Freddie Freeloader and Blue in Green, had been playing at the wrong speed since 1959. Vinyl LP included is in stereo and was wondering (as a guy whos relatively new to jazz) whether Miles Davis (and any jazz record pre-1968-69) should be listened to in mono or stereo? 1A/1AE)with the Side 2 track-list error corrected, so stereo lacquer 1A was used only in later pressings, not in any early stereo pressing run. The interesting part is the lacquer numbers associated with two-eye edition, commencing with the tail end of the 1BA-1BL run, and the start of the 1CA 1CLrun. UPDATE 12/08/19: a copy with 1F has been found, with track listing error Side 2 1D/1F with TA etching (Conn. plant). So many people out there. Not cool. I'll have to give it a try. In the case of Stereo, six lacquers account for half of all the copies manufactured, none of which are single alphabetic 1A to 1L. HARRY T BOOKER Mister Is Blue MONO/STEREO 45 Promo Rare Soul WB. Ebay auctions of Kind of Blue on six-eye label over last three years where, seller identified matrix on both sides (198 commercial releases, 218 in total including twenty promos). Where? (Also, the mono mix for "Flowers Never Bend with the Rainfall" sounds better to me, but that mix seems to only appear on the single and not on the album) The stereo has far higher dynamic range and feels less compressed. A,B and C could have manufactured the lot. I listen to critics and online commenters whose point of view I can understand. First, a recap of conventional wisdom information gathered in good faith from partial experience, true of some circumstances, but not necessarily applicable to all. It is a sort of rattling sound. They were distributed to various plants in an arbitrary pairs,at least two laquers per plant, and those plants mixed Side 1 and Side 2 stampers from different laquers. DE 49th;ad infinitum. Miles Daviss spiralling, restless trumpet on Freddie Freeloader and its seesaw insinuation on All Blues, Bill Evanss delicate, meditative haiku of a piano in Flamenco Sketches, Coltranes silken, slithering tenor lament on Blue in Green, Paul Chambers low, slow heartbeat of a bass, the soft, considered percussion of Jimmy Cobbs drums and the pulsing tick of his cymbals are all immaculately rendered. The 2012 stereo is best forgotten. the typesetting differs, a small point-size round font on one line There are a very large number of 1D/1D and 1J/1J matchingletter pairs found, which all have the same one line album title label style. If I'm reading this correctly, this mono vinyl reissue is an all analogue cut? 3D-imaging and the wide, deep soundstage are eyebrow-raising; these Davis mono remaster titles sold me on other mono remasters, and rival (IMHO, to my ears) the Columbia/Legacy 180g six-eye stereo remaster I bought last year. At one point, in theearlymid60s, five plantswere in simultaneous operation, which helpsexplain whymultiple laquers were being cut to supportpressing of consistent quality at many different locations. I am afraid I agree entirely. Where a piece published after 26th October 2012 appears which is linked to this activity, the text will be followed by the following symbol:(pp), Website styled by Richard Bateman using the Broadsheet Theme for WordPress, London Jazz News Logo designed by Mike Lloyd @Yellow Design, As regards liablity for consequences of any action taken in response to information provided on LondonJazz, we adopt, All original content on these pages is fingerprinted and certified by. Columbia was a major, not the sort of small operator that would use up wrong labels to save money. Location: Carbondale, IL USA. Kind of Blue, an Album by Miles Davis. The importance of wires, auditioning methods and othertips. The original mono LPs did not have this problem because they were cut from a different tape from a different recorder. I don't hear it throughout the record. I have other old mono records (e.g. The Holy Grail, Kind of Blue, six eye stereo KoB 3. I even threw in the 90's SBM cd for the hell of it. One even declared it was the first pressing because the matrix suffix started with a 1 (simply original tape mix, like all). More rock n roll. It was remixed properly. ORIGINAL! For this reason, it doesnt really matter whether your copy is a Bridgeport, Pitman, Terre Haute or Hollywood. About these vinyl. The mono tapes have gone missing. Doesnt mean there arent others higher, just not in my sample. My initial thought in reply to my questioner was the lazy answer, " it depends which you prefer" . The 81 is the only mono Pepper that impresses me. Hence promos are all proven pre 11/59. I grew up in the mono era. 2 sense. For some records, possibly. Kind of Blue was recorded in both mono and three track stereo at Columbia's 30th St Studios. Mono tracks send only one channel for all speakers. Looking at theYouTube video and write-upon HD tracks and on the sister site: http://www.audiostream.com/content/miles-davis-kind-blue-again. 8 Decca? He is loved and well know by audiophiles and musicians all over the world. To compare with MOV versions (which are stereo) you should probably compare the Mobile Fidelity versions, which are also stereo. Why didn't they use the orginal mono tapes? I purchased one of the Dino-Lite USB microscopes and intend on using it to see how well my RCM is working. Or are they some digital combinaison? I believe that would be earlier. The new 24/192k mix is very good !! Since neither mono tape surfaced it must be assumed they were repurposed or stolen. The mono original (and reissue) provides a better overall instrumental balance, with greater emphasis on the piano and more solid imaging. My dad put aside a copy of the Kind of Blue 50th anniversary box set for me recently. Stereo promos, like mono,dont follow any -1A -1B -1C patterneither; they are E, K, AC and AE. At other plants, stampers were deliberately chosen from different laquers. I just received my RSD numbered copy today and it has the same feel as my original pressing. Progress, what is it with that word that it manges to bug me so often? That, and . Do you guys really think that Tao and Miles OR THE RECORDING AND MASTERING ENGINEERS wouldn't notice the speed was off? Newly remastered from the backup stereo tapes, the anniversary Kind of Blue was released on both CD and LP. After hearing a lot of different versions of KOB I believe it's just the sound of the mute which is raw and gritty. They were only on CD or SACD at that point since vinyl was done by Classic. It sounds like a microphone that is being over-driven. I can verify that when sets of lacquers were cut for an album or a single, at least one set was shipped to Canada. Quite a lot, as it happens. lacquer letter progression rapidly stops being a useful guide to the very earliest pressings. Released 17 August 1959 on Columbia (catalog no. It is art after alland there is really only one master, and only one first pressing which Miles and Teo agreed on as being "finished". and from others better equipped than I to shed light on its innate greatness or lasting musical significance. See Promo Cover Fabricator new section below). This is true EVEN IF the original artist/people are involved in the later versions. So unless you have a bucket of cash and shell out for an OG mono your better off . Both the mono and the stereo originals display the same pitch problem, that went un-corrected for decades. No, by the time I got interested in old mono pressings, the price on Piper had gotten too high. Has anyone compared the Sony's Miles reissues to MoFi's? How far is the Kind of Blue manufacturing system representative of that of other Columbia titles? . At their web site? Instrumental timbers are natural and textures rich. Will debut at record stores on November 29th or thereabouts. The above example on loan from a friend has 1D/ 1G stamper matrices, the Side 2 label track sequence error, but more interesting are the T/ TA stamps on the opposite side of the deadwax. So, would you consider the stereo "unfolded"? I could go on about the sound but I think the real point is that given todays best 24/192 PCM processing/mixing and using original vinyl as a reference for the new mix, great things can be done. Perhaps that is one reason why so many were cut: quality control in distributed pressing through inexpensive redundancy. Both mono and stereo six-eyes with a uniquely Canadian touch. affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network, and I'm not going to write about the modal music here. There are also six missing lacquers, matrix code letters not found on either side on any stereo six eye: C, D, F, G, K and L. We now know where lacquer B went (or at least mothers derived from it): Canada. Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by Adagio, Jun 27, 2021. Though lacquers were cut and numbered sequentially at the point of manufacture, for Kind of Blue at least, they were not drawn for use sequentially. Though T has been suggested as referring to Terre Haute, it remains likely a Bridgeport pressing suggested by the label fonts. Early vs later pressing Side 2 track list error, Illustrated below, thetrack listing error, left (1.Flamenco Sketches 2. AH 19th; AJ 20th; AK 21st; AL 22nd; BA 23rd; BB 24th; The four monos I have vary from Poor to VG. Do you expect much improvement over the Classic Records stereo 45 release from the 90s? Kind of Blue mono promo jacket codes 2 (NY), 4 and 6 (IN). Stereo promos replicate the early track sequence error seen on the mono promolabels i.e. The two stereo tapes were stored safely in a vault for over three decades before anyone thought of taking them out for remastering. Again, I'm very happy with my Columbia RSD pressing. There are clusters around certain letters, for example 1AJ on Side 1 is found with Side 2 as 1AD, 1AE,1AF and 1AG. I have three different versions. The SACD always sounded kind of tubby/boomy but the CD is awful compared to these new files. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. I picked it up about six months ago and like it a lot. Seven of these albums - 'Round About Midnight, Miles Ahead (both 1957), Milestones (1958), Porgy And Bess, Kind Of Blue (both 1959), Sketches Of Spain (1960) and Someday My Prince Will Come (1961) - are familiar classics which saw Miles rise to prominence as an architect of the hard bop style of jazz before revolutionizing the genre with ventures Photos not available for this variation. The aboveexamples of1A 1B and 1C labels (note, always1Aas Side 2) each feature the two line bold album title. ), Forum Policies, Rules, and Terms of Service. The process-control system to keep track of lacquers, mothers and stampers did not require matching or sequencing, becauseit did not matter which lacquer was used, as they were all the same as long as you had a Side 1 and a Side 2 stamper mounted in the press. With Indianas convenient central US location, equidistant to East And West Coast, and a short distance for Illinois, it was possibly more economical to manufacture covers centrally and ship to pressing plants, but it takes some explaining why Kind of Blue promo jackets were manufactured at two locations, unless they were also being pressed at two plants Terre Haute and Bridgeport or even three, Hollywood, hence the code 6. I, Play the Impulse mono`s with a true mono cartridge. Green Dolphin Street was recorded just before the Kind of Blue sessions and features the same line up John Coltrane tenor sax, Bill Evans piano, Jimmy Cobb drums and Paul Chambers bass. Although for current mono reissues they are using the stereo fold down because the mono original is lost. To be fair, some are done better than others (I say this only having listened through speakers - I don't want to think about what the . Those lacquers existed, and were put into service from 1963 onwards until the early. W.B of New York adds following correction (September 16,2017): To understand how Columbia matrix codes worked in practice, over 1,000 individual Ebay auctions of. The vinyl isnow secondand the SACD is third on the list (IMHO). FIRST! Another waxed lyrical over a 1A/1B six-eye stereo RARE! Read John Marks' account of hearing the three-track master tape at Sony Studios. A plant didnt get the memo and carried on using old pre-correction labels. One of the quirks of jacket manufacture was the code used by the giant fabricator Imperial Packing, Indianapolis, changed according to the pressing plants it was supplying 4 for US Central (Terre Haute) and 6 when supplying West Coast (Hollywood). Mostauction copieshave the corrected Side 2 label, but some sellers claim theirs isan original first pressing, simply because it is a Six-Eye label. It is not staid, especially side 2. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. Barcode and Other Identifiers Barcode: 4 547366 450958 Other Versions (5 of 502) View All Recommendations Kind Of Blue Miles Davis At least that's my understanding of how it worked. With 1D (different printer and pressing location?) It is not known how many labels with the side 2 error were printed, but the presence of the Side 2 error is proof of earlypressing status 8/59 to 11/59. When stereo appeared, I was overwhelmed (pace the ping pong crap). Did Teo ever say why he hated the Sony releases? 2011 Vinyl LP Not Now / NOT2LP145 Kind of . Sorry, guys. I asked him about all the fuss surrounding the speed correction of the Sony releases.